<!-- --><!-- --><style type="text/css">@import url(http://www.blogger.com/static/v1/v-css/navbar/697174003-classic.css); div.b-mobile {display:none;} </style> </head><body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener("load", function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <iframe src="http://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=8620239607566445088&amp;blogName=1,369+lightbulbs&amp;publishMode=PUBLISH_MODE_HOSTED&amp;navbarType=BLACK&amp;layoutType=CLASSIC&amp;searchRoot=http://www.1369lightbulbs.com/search&amp;blogLocale=en_US&amp;homepageUrl=http://www.1369lightbulbs.com/&amp;vt=-7701273094786727802" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" height="30px" width="100%" id="navbar-iframe" allowtransparency="true" title="Blogger Navigation and Search"></iframe> <div></div>

Tuesday, June 24, 2008


A scathing report released today by the Justice Department's own inspector general puts officials there on full blast:
Justice Department officials over the last six years illegally used “political or ideological” factors to hire new lawyers into an elite recruitment program, tapping law school graduates with conservative credentials over those with liberal-sounding resumes.

Wait, hold up...liberal-sounding resumes? What the hell does that even mean?

In the minds of these folks, it means you're educated at our best schools, care about saving the planet, decrease in poverty and improvement in race relations:
The shift began in 2002, when advisers to then-Attorney General John Ashcroft restructured the honors program in response to what some officials saw as a liberal tilt in recruiting young lawyers from elite law schools like Harvard and Yale. While the recruitment was once controlled largely by career officials in each section who would review applications, political officials in the department began to assume more control, rejecting candidates with liberal or Democratic affiliations “at a significantly higher rate” than those with Republican or conservative credentials, the report said.

The shift appeared to accelerate in 2006, under then-Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, with two aides on the screening committee — Michael Elston and Esther Slater McDonald — singled out for particular criticism. The blocking of applicants with liberal credentials appeared to be a particular problem in the Justice Department’s civil rights division, which has seen an exodus of career employees in recent years as the department has pursued a more conservative agenda in deciding what types of cases to bring.

Applications that contained what were seen as “leftist commentary” or “buzz words” like environmental and social justice were often grounds for rejecting applicants, according to e-mails reviewed by the inspector general’s office. Membership in liberal organizations like the American Constitution Society, Greenpeace, or the Poverty and Race Research Action Council were also seen as negative marks.

Affiliation with the Federalist Society, a prominent conservative group, was viewed positively.

I can see why membership in something called the "American Constitution Society" wouldn't wash with this group.

This is akin to Black folks telling themselves that you're not cool or you're acting White if you study hard and get good grades. Let's not hire the smartest people and see how that works out!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home